- Zopa Talk
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: pomma9649
pomma9649
Member Since 02 Dec 2007Offline Last Active Jan 15 2012 10:11
About Me
got a bit late with the Christmas spirit this year...
I blame January 31st..will be better when that's gone....
I blame January 31st..will be better when that's gone....
Community Stats
- Group Members lvl 1
- Active Posts 2,039
- Profile Views 25,099
- Member Title Zeus
- Age 64 years old
- Birthday June 9, 1949
-
Gender
Female
-
Location
Kendal, Lake District
-
Interests
Walking, music, gardening, talking, travelling, playing with money....
0
Neutral
User Tools
Latest Visitors
Posts I've Made
In Topic: Happy Birthday Easteregg
09 July 2011 - 21:12
happy birthday egg..hope you had fun!
In Topic: East Africa Emergency Appeal
09 July 2011 - 21:10
Parker Pyne, on 09 July 2011 - 09:34, said:
Sadly, no longer. I clicked on the link and found this message: "Please note: Due to the overwhelming public response, the Big Give matching funds are now exhausted, and donations to most organisations are no longer being doubled. However, a private donor has generously offered to continue matching donations to Ethiopiaid only."
In Topic: Fair Treatment of Peer-to-Peer Lending Losses (Discussion Thread)
07 July 2011 - 10:32
I have a reply from Tim Farron, my local MP who says:
Thank you very much for your recent email with reagrd to the need for tax amendments to support the expansion of peer to peer lending.
I am fully supportive of this admirable development and am pleased to record that I have already made representations on behalf of your peers to the Chancellor. This enables me to enclose a copy of the response from the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury.
Whilst I am disappointed that the Monister is unable to commit to changes at the present time, I am encouraged that he appears open to dialogue on this issue. I am sure that it has been helpful to draw his attention to the need for change and I hope that he will soon be moved to action. With best wishes....
and the reply from David Gauke on behalf of George Osbourne says:
I agree that peer to peer lending is a valuable source of finance. This industry is undoubtedly growing but remains at this time relatively small. As the business expands, or market conditions change, we fully recognise that the taxation treatment of those within the industry may need fuller consideration. This is especially true as it is likely that the dynamic of the business will evolve and change over time, and therefore so will its role within the competitive loan market.
When considering tax changes to any sector we must fully consider the range of potential impacts any changes may have, including for example, resourcing and compliance, European state aid issues, and broad economic impacts.
As things stand, we do not think that the current tax treatment of peer to peer investors is necessarily a barrier to the growth of the market. Also, it is unclear why peer to peer investors should be treated differently to an investor who dabbles in the gilts market (and who is subject to the same tax rules).
However, we would be happy to consider any evidence on this point. We will of course continue to monitor developments, and welcome your thoughts on this matter.
Please pass on my thanks to your constituent for taking the trouble to make us aware of these concerns.....
ooh..just beaten to it by brummie fred!!
Thank you very much for your recent email with reagrd to the need for tax amendments to support the expansion of peer to peer lending.
I am fully supportive of this admirable development and am pleased to record that I have already made representations on behalf of your peers to the Chancellor. This enables me to enclose a copy of the response from the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury.
Whilst I am disappointed that the Monister is unable to commit to changes at the present time, I am encouraged that he appears open to dialogue on this issue. I am sure that it has been helpful to draw his attention to the need for change and I hope that he will soon be moved to action. With best wishes....
and the reply from David Gauke on behalf of George Osbourne says:
I agree that peer to peer lending is a valuable source of finance. This industry is undoubtedly growing but remains at this time relatively small. As the business expands, or market conditions change, we fully recognise that the taxation treatment of those within the industry may need fuller consideration. This is especially true as it is likely that the dynamic of the business will evolve and change over time, and therefore so will its role within the competitive loan market.
When considering tax changes to any sector we must fully consider the range of potential impacts any changes may have, including for example, resourcing and compliance, European state aid issues, and broad economic impacts.
As things stand, we do not think that the current tax treatment of peer to peer investors is necessarily a barrier to the growth of the market. Also, it is unclear why peer to peer investors should be treated differently to an investor who dabbles in the gilts market (and who is subject to the same tax rules).
However, we would be happy to consider any evidence on this point. We will of course continue to monitor developments, and welcome your thoughts on this matter.
Please pass on my thanks to your constituent for taking the trouble to make us aware of these concerns.....
ooh..just beaten to it by brummie fred!!
- Zopa Talk
- → Viewing Profile: Posts: pomma9649
- Privacy Policy
- Forum Terms & Rules ·



Find content



